Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
RFK Jr. proposes new approach to measles: nutrition, data transparency, parental choice take center stage
By ljdevon // 2025-03-05
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
The media is reporting on a measles resurgence in Texas, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (now head of Health and Human Services) is reassuring parents that the measles vaccine is available as part of the routine MMR vaccine series. However, Kennedy's neutral vaccine stance has disturbed the mothers and fathers who have witnessed vaccine injury from the MMR vaccine. These mothers and fathers are the backbone of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement - a movement that helped propel Kennedy to his important post in the federal government. Despite Kennedy's pro-vaccine stance, the current dissension within MAHA movement isn’t necessary and distracts from the bigger goals of the movement and the changes that are taking place within HHS. Moreover, making historic changes to public health policy -- including the publication of vaccine truths -- will take more than just Kennedy himself. To fight and win against the corruption in the public health agencies, cooperation is desperately needed from the MAHA movement if any changes are going to be made.

RFK Jr. introduces new concepts to public health messaging

In a bold departure from traditional public health strategies, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has unveiled a groundbreaking framework for addressing measles that prioritizes nutrition, transparency, and parental autonomy. This new approach challenges the status quo of vaccine-centric policies and offers a fresh perspective on combating infectious diseases. Kennedy’s proposal, rooted in scientific evidence and a commitment to individual choice, has sparked both hope and controversy, as it directly confronts the entrenched interests of the pharmaceutical industry and government bureaucracies. Kennedy’s plan, outlined in a recent op-ed, emphasizes the role of vitamin A in reducing measles mortality, highlights the historical decline of measles deaths prior to vaccine introduction, and reaffirms the importance of informed decision-making for families. While critics have attempted to mischaracterize his stance as pro-vaccine, Kennedy’s message is clear: health policy must prioritize truth, transparency, and the right of parents to make informed choices for their children. Kennedy’s approach to measles represents a seismic shift in how public health officials address infectious diseases. Key elements of his proposal include: • Nutrition as a cornerstone of health: Kennedy cites scientific literature showing that vitamin A supplementation can dramatically reduce measles mortality. This aligns with broader evidence that proper nutrition strengthens the immune system and mitigates the severity of infectious diseases. • Historical context: Measles deaths declined by 98% before the introduction of the MMR vaccine, thanks to improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and healthcare access. Kennedy’s acknowledgment of this fact challenges the narrative that vaccines are solely responsible for reducing disease mortality. • Parental choice: Kennedy unequivocally supports the right of parents to make informed decisions about vaccination, free from coercion or mandates. These principles mark a stark contrast to the one-size-fits-all policies promoted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in recent decades. By focusing on nutrition and individual autonomy, Kennedy’s plan offers a more holistic and empowering approach to public health.

The importance of investigating a tragic case

Kennedy’s proposal comes at a critical moment, as questions swirl around the death of a child allegedly caused by measles. The case, which has been used to justify aggressive vaccine mandates, raises serious concerns about medical error and misdiagnosis. According to reports, the child was hospitalized for RSV and pneumonia but was administered the MMR vaccine during their stay—a clear violation of medical guidelines, which advise against vaccinating individuals who are already fighting serious infections. According to reports, shortly after receiving the vaccine, the child tested positive for measles, and their death was attributed to the disease. This tragic sequence of events highlights the potential dangers of administering vaccines to immunocompromised individuals and underscores the need for thorough investigations into such cases. Health authorities should recommend a full review of the child’s medical records to determine whether the death was truly caused by measles or if it was the result of medical mismanagement, a complication from a hospital acquired infection, or the MMR vaccine itself. Hospital treatment protocols must focus on treating infectious disease with the correct nutrients and medicines, instead of pushing vaccines on children who are allegedly already allergic to them, as was reported in this case. To set the record straight, Kennedy should not only comfort the family of the deceased child, but also recommend a wrongful death case against the hospital, to get the facts straight about the case and report any potential medical errors and mismanagement.

Correcting the record and restoring trust

The misdiagnosis and subsequent misrepresentation of a child’s death as a failure of vaccine policy is a troubling example of how public health narratives can be manipulated. By attributing the death to measles, authorities have used the case to push for stricter vaccine mandates, despite evidence suggesting that medical error played a significant role. Kennedy’s call for transparency and accountability in this case is not just about correcting the record—it’s about restoring public trust in health agencies. For too long, the public has been misled about the risks and benefits of vaccines, and the consequences of these misrepresentations have been devastating. RFK Jr.’s vision for public health is a fight for the future—a future where families have access to accurate information, where nutrition is recognized as a vital tool for preventing disease, and where individual choice is respected. His approach challenges the toxic alliance between Big Pharma and government agencies, offering a path forward that prioritizes people over profits. As Kennedy navigates the treacherous waters of Washington, D.C., he faces relentless opposition from those who benefit from the status quo. Yet, his strategic and principled leadership provides hope for a brighter future. By focusing on data transparency, nutrition, and parental autonomy, Kennedy is laying the groundwork for a public health system that truly serves the people. Instead of fighting, the MAHA movement must get behind Kennedy if real changes are going to be made  to immunization policy. Sources include: TheTruthAboutCancer.Substack.com Foxnews.com Naturalpedia.com Facebook.com
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy