- Joseph Farrell questions the official narrative of 9/11, suggesting a more intricate and orchestrated attack than previously believed, involving multiple layers and players.
- Researcher Jay Kolar points out significant inconsistencies in the FBI's case against the 19 hijackers, with at least 10 of them found alive years later, raising doubts about their involvement and the possibility of deliberate misidentification.
- Atta, the alleged ringleader, exhibited behaviors inconsistent with a devout Muslim extremist, such as frequenting strip clubs and using drugs. This has led to speculation that he was a "legend" or pawn in a larger operation, potentially orchestrated by a global network.
- The official stories of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon and United Airlines Flight 93 crashing in Pennsylvania are riddled with inconsistencies. Eyewitness accounts and physical evidence suggest alternative scenarios, such as a missile strike on the Pentagon and the possibility of Flight 93 being shot down.
- Unusual trading activity before 9/11 and the potential use of exotic technologies like directed energy weapons or micro-nukes point to a network with access to advanced technology and vast financial resources. This network may have orchestrated the attacks to cover up a massive financial crime and eliminate evidence.
In his provocative book "
Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations," Joseph Farrell delves into the murky depths of conspiracy and intrigue – questioning the very foundations of what we believe about 9/11.
The official account of 9/11 identifies 19 hijackers as the perpetrators of the attacks. However, as researcher Jay Kolar highlights, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's case against them was riddled with inconsistencies.
Remarkably, at least 10 of the named hijackers were found to be alive four years after the attacks – casting doubt on their involvement. This revelation begs the question: Were these individuals deliberately misidentified to create a convenient scapegoat? If so, who orchestrated this misdirection and to what end?
One of the most scrutinized figures is Mohamed Atta, the alleged ringleader. His behavior marked by visits to strip clubs, heavy drinking and drug use seems at odds with the profile of a devout Muslim extremist.
Daniel Hopsicker, a researcher who has extensively studied Atta's life, suggests that his actions were so peculiar they appeared to be a deliberate attempt to attract attention. Could Atta have been a pawn in a larger game,
a "legend" created to divert attention from the real architects of the attacks?
Atta's connections to Huffman Aviation in Florida add another layer of complexity to the narrative. The flight school's owner, Rudi Dekkers, was entangled in a web of criminal activities, including drug and high-tech chip smuggling, with alleged ties to the
Central Intelligence Agency.
Hopsicker posits that Huffman Aviation might have served as a front for a global network, potentially using Atta and his associates for its own clandestine purposes. This raises the possibility that the hijackers were not acting independently but were part of a more extensive, orchestrated operation.
The official story of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon is also fraught with inconsistencies. Eyewitness accounts and physical evidence suggest that a much smaller aircraft or even a missile struck the building.
The lack of significant debris and the nature of the damage further fuel speculation. Was the Pentagon hit by a missile, or was
the attack a false flag operation designed to resemble a terrorist strike?
The fate of United Airlines Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, is equally perplexing. Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's offhand remark about the plane being "shot down" adds to the mystery.
Could Flight 93 have been shot down to prevent the hijackers from revealing the deeper layers of the operation? This would imply that the perpetrators were not just terrorists but elements within the U.S. government itself.
The financial aspects of 9/11 also warrant scrutiny; unusual trading activity in the days leading up to the attacks suggests foreknowledge. While the 9/11 Commission dismissed these trades as innocuous, researcher Jim Marrs points out that the U.S. government held the majority of the "short" positions. Could this indicate the existence of a rogue network within
the U.S. national security apparatus?
Perhaps the most chilling possibility is the involvement of a global network with access to advanced technology and vast financial resources. Researcher E.P. Heidner suggests that this network orchestrated the attacks to cover up a massive financial crime. The destruction of the Twin Towers could have been a deliberate act to eliminate evidence and create a false flag event.
The use of exotic technologies such as directed energy weapons or micro-nukes supports the idea of a third level of involvement. These technologies are beyond the capabilities of traditional terrorist organizations and would require the backing of a powerful, technologically advanced entity. Could this be the same network that Mohamed Atta was connected to through the Carl Duisberg Gesellschaft, a society with ties to the infamous I.G. Farben cartel?
The events of 9/11 were likely more than just a terrorist attack. They were a complex operation involving multiple layers and players, from
a rogue network within the U.S. government to a global network with ties to international finance, terrorism and advanced technology. As we peel back the layers, we uncover a story that is as terrifying as it is complex, challenging everything we thought we knew about one of the darkest days in American history.
Learn more about the book "
Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery" by watching the video below.
This video is from the
BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
Parler
Gab
Copy
