Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Canadian nurses face fines, job loss for questioning transgender ideology in private conversations
By isabelle // 2025-04-07
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
  • Medical professionals face fines, job loss, and license revocation for challenging transgender policies or stating biological facts.
  • A B.C. nurse was fined $10,000 for privately calling gender surgeries "mutilation," despite no discriminatory action taken.
  • Another nurse was fired for supporting J.K. Rowling and saying that only women can give birth, labeled as "professional misconduct."
  • A UK nurse was suspended for using accurate pronouns for a transgender inmate, while facing racial slurs with no protection.
  • These cases expose a systemic crackdown on dissent, where institutions enforce ideological conformity over truth and free speech.
In Western nations that pride themselves on democracy and free expression, a growing number of medical professionals are facing draconian penalties — including fines, job loss, and license revocation — simply for questioning transgender policies or asserting biological facts. From British Columbia to the United Kingdom, nurses and doctors are being disciplined for expressing concerns about sex-based rights, echoing a broader ideological battle over truth, science, and professional integrity.

Silenced for speaking out

In British Columbia, nurse Kirsten Olsen was fined $10,000 by the province’s Human Rights Tribunal after privately expressing concerns to a transgender friend about the risks of gender-affirming surgery. Despite admitting that Olsen’s eviction of her tenant was unrelated to gender identity, the tribunal ruled her comments about mastectomies being “mutilation” were “transphobic.” Her lawyer, Marty Moore of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), called the decision a violation of free expression, arguing, “A comment of concern for a friend is very different than evicting someone on the basis of their... protected characteristic.” Meanwhile, former nurse Amy Hamm was fired without severance by Vancouver Coastal Health after being found guilty of “professional misconduct” by the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM). Her crime? Supporting J.K. Rowling, opposing male access to women’s spaces, and stating basic biological facts — such as that only women can give birth. The BCCNM’s 115-page ruling dismissed her argument that she was criticizing “transgender activists” rather than transgender individuals, claiming her statements were “designed to lower the standing of transgender persons.” Hamm, now a vocal advocate for women’s rights, vowed to appeal, writing, “I value the truth more than my reputation.”

Religious freedom under attack

Across the Atlantic, UK nurse Jennifer Melle faced suspension and a potential career-ending investigation after referring to a male transgender inmate—a convicted pedophile—as “mister” and “he” during a medical discussion. When the patient responded by hurling racial slurs and lunging at her, Melle was disciplined for “not respecting the patient’s preferred identity,” while her white colleague faced no consequences for the same language. “I am expected to tolerate racism, deny biological reality, and suppress my deeply held Christian beliefs,” Melle told the Daily Mail. The Christian Legal Centre, representing her, accused the NHS of prioritizing ideology over safety. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch condemned Melle’s treatment as “completely crazy.” These cases reveal a disturbing trend: institutions punishing professionals for dissenting from progressive orthodoxy, even in private conversations. The BCCNM justified its crackdown by claiming Hamm’s statements could undermine trust in nursing—yet ignored the chilling effect of suppressing scientific debate. As J.K. Rowling declared in support of Hamm, “This quasi-religious bullshit is just that: bullshit.” The implications are dire. If acknowledging biological reality becomes grounds for termination, and faith-based speech is labeled misconduct, the medical field risks becoming an ideological monolith—one that prioritizes dogma over patient well-being and professional honesty. From Canada’s punitive tribunals to the NHS’s ideological enforcement, these cases underscore a systemic assault on free speech, science, and conscience. Medical professionals should not have to choose between their careers and the truth. As Hamm defiantly stated, “I will continue to speak it, in the company of other brave and sane Canadians who can plainly see that a man is a man.” The battle for liberty, it seems, is far from over. Sources for this article include: JustTheNews.com DailyMail.co.uk NationalPost.com
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy