Ontario judge rules against family of Canadian teen killed by the lethal COVID-19 injection

By ramontomeydw // 2025-03-31

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

An Ontario judge dismissed a lawsuit by Dan Hartman, whose 17-year-old son Sean died after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, stating the government has no "private law duty of care" for injuries caused by public health decisions.
The ruling emphasized that Health Canada’s pandemic policies prioritized public health over individual risks, shielding officials and drugmakers from liability for vaccine-related harms.
Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) has approved only 103 out of 1,859 claims, leaving most victims, including the Hartmans, without recourse.
Dan filed a $35.6 million lawsuit against Pfizer, accusing the company of concealing risks (like myocarditis) and misrepresenting vaccine safety. Medical evidence linked Sean's death to the shot.
The case highlights broader failures – coercive mandates, lack of accountability and bureaucratic indifference – leaving families without justice as vaccine injuries go unacknowledged.

A judge in Canada's Ontario province has issued a ruling against the family of a teenager killed by the lethal Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) injection. Blacklock's Reporter said on Wednesday, March 26, that Ontario Superior Court Justice Sandra Antoniani was the magistrate behind the decision. "The plaintiff's tragedy is real, but there is no private law duty of care made out," she wrote. "There is no private law duty of care to individual members of the public injured by government core policy decisions in the handling of health emergencies which impact the general population." The ruling was in relation to a case filed by Dan Hartman, whose 17-year-old son Sean died after getting the COVID-19 injection. The teenager died on Sept. 27, 2021 – almost five weeks after being injected with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 shot. According to the magistrate, Health Canada – the federal health department and defendant in the lawsuit – "deemed that urgent action was necessary" to address the pandemic. She further continued that the department's actions "were aimed at mitigating the health impact of a global pandemic on the Canadian public." "Imposition of a private duty of care would have a negative impact on the ability of the defendants to prioritize the interests of the entire public, with the distraction of fear over the possibility of harm to individual members of the public, and the risk of litigation and unlimited liability." Five years after the pandemic, the Canadian government is now washing its hands of any responsibility for the injuries and deaths caused by these experimental shots. Ottawa's sweeping mandates, which pressured millions into taking a barely tested medical intervention, now absolve it of any obligation to those who suffered severe consequences.

Forced to comply, denied compensation

While officials continue to justify their coercive policies as necessary for public health, families like that of Sean are left without justice – their suffering dismissed as collateral damage in the name of pandemic mitigation. Sean's father Dan has been fighting for accountability ever since, only to be met with legal roadblocks and bureaucratic indifference. The Hartman family's ordeal is far from unique. Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP), established in December 2020, was supposed to provide recourse for those harmed by COVID-19 vaccines. Yet, out of 1,859 claims filed, only 103 have been approved – meaning thousands of Canadians alleging vaccine injuries have been left in limbo. (Related: Grueling process: Canada has only settled 8 COVID-19 vaccine injury claims; HUNDREDS are still on waiting list.) Denied compensation through VISP, Dan had no choice but take the matter to court – filing a separate $35.6 million lawsuit in October 2023. He accused Pfizer of negligence and misrepresentation. The grieving father also accused the New York-based drug giant of concealed the risks of its vaccine, including myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle). Dan's legal counsel Umar Sheikh argued in the filing that Pfizer "concealed the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination had severe possible risks and outcomes when administered, including but not limited to myocarditis, pericarditis (heart lining inflammation) and death." According to court documents, an American doctor determined that Sean's death was caused by the Pfizer shot. The 17-year-old received the vaccine under pressure from his local hockey league. "They said there is no proof the vaccine killed Sean. There’s also no proof that it didn't," Hartman said at the time. expressing frustration with the system's unwillingness to acknowledge the truth. Sheikh also mentioned in the lawsuit that Pfizer "owed a duty of care to Sean to accurately inform him of all risks associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination." Unfortunately, the recent ruling by Antoniani reaffirmed that the drug giant isn't accountable to the Hartman family and others who were injured and killed by its lethal vaccine. Watch Dan Hartman talking about his fight for answers about his son's untimely demise with Dr. Chris Shoemaker in this clip. This video is from the NoVaxx channel on Brighteon.com.

CITIZENS NEWS

Forced to comply, denied compensation

More related stories: