Photo credits: Julio-Cesar Chavez/Reuters According to the news outlet, the document was dated Aug. 14 and named Trump, citing the case as "open," but is no longer available on the court's website as of press time. The media portal was not immediately able to determine why the item was posted or removed. The county courts clerk Che Alexander's office called the posted document "fictitious." However, the office also failed to reason out how it got on the court’s website. It said that the list came out with no official case numbers. Thus, it was not considered official filings and should not be treated as such. But the document that appeared online did have a case number on it. The Associated Press saw that there was actually an assigned number on the document. Alexander declined to comment when the news outlet inquired. Meanwhile, "experts" think that this is just a "minor booboo" as prosecutors may have already drafted indictments that they would present to the grand jury, which ultimately decides whether to hand charges down and this is what was posted on the site. "I think this tells us what they are planning to present to the grand jury, and the grand jury could say no," said Georgia State University law professor Clark Cunningham. He also said while the error will give Trump's legal team fodder to complain, it likely won't ultimately impact the case. And indeed, Trump quickly reacted to the "major error," further citing how the investigations are clearly politically motivated and possibly rigged. "The Grand Jury testimony has not even FINISHED but it is clear the District Attorney has already decided how this case will end," the former president wrote in the email. "They are trying to rob me of my right to due process. This is an absolute DISGRACE." The Republican presidential candidate's legal team said this could not be a simple administrative mistake. "It showed that the prosecutors' office had no respect for the integrity of the grand jury process," Trump's campaign group lamented. "This is emblematic of the pervasive and glaring constitutional violations which have plagued this case from its very inception," Trump lawyers Drew Findling, Jennifer Little and Marissa Goldberg said.BREAKING: Fulton County GA court's website shared a doc listing charges against Trump then took the document down without explanation.
?????? pic.twitter.com/OeTvEzf6lD — TheBlaze (@theblaze) August 14, 2023
Trump will NOT attend any Republican primary debates
By Laura Harris // Share
Senators call for FTC investigation into Google over YouTube ads that violate children’s privacy
By Laura Harris // Share
Joe Biden lies, tells Maui fire survivors he has a sense of ‘what it’s like to lose a home’
By Gregory Van Dyke // Share
Texas seeks more than $1 BILLION from Planned Parenthood for fraudulent Medicaid claims
By Cassie B. // Share
Gallup poll: Los Angeles among five cities deemed unsafe to live in or visit
By Richard Brown // Share
Debunking McGill's "dirty dozen" hit piece: Flawed sources, pharma ties, and biased reporting
By newseditors // Share
Your lyin' eyes: Corporate media panics with 'fact checks' over Biden's obvious decline
By newseditors // Share