CITIZENS NEWS

Bombshell analysis of voting anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia proves election was STOLEN from Trump

By jdheyes // 2020-12-09

For the past couple of weeks as vote tallies in a number of key battleground states made it appear as though Joe Biden was the victor, the disgusting, dishonest mainstream media as well as Democrats in Congress have been demanding that President Donald Trump concede. But the president has refused to do so — and wisely so — as more and more evidence of massive vote fraud has been found. In addition to witness testimony, hundreds of statisticians and other experts have signed sworn affidavits that the manner in which votes came rolling in for Biden during suspicious “spikes” in the wee hours of the morning after election night are both highly improper and numerically impossible. And now, a new analysis of those spikes appears to prove, unequivocally, that the election was stolen from President Trump, who was on path to destroy Biden. “In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major ‘vote spikes’ that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia,” the analysis’ executive summary reads. “Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these ‘vote spikes.’ Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes,” it continued.  “While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny,” the report adds. “Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern.” Here are some highlights from the analysis and report: — Analysts relied on “publicly available data” from 8,954 vote updates published by The New York Times to both identify and break down statistical anomalies in several battleground states. — Nearly all voting updates across states of all sizes and political leanings followed a similar pattern. However, seven updates followed the pattern the least and of those, four individual updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — “were particularly anomalous and influential…and all occurred within the same five hour window.” — The four questionable updates are as follows:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

“We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes,” the analysis continued. Before these suspicious pattern updates, late on election night President Trump led Biden by: — Roughly 100,000 votes in Wisconsin; — About 300,000 votes in Michigan. Trump was also leading Biden in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Just a rough tabulation showed that for Biden to have won those states, he “would have to substantially improve his performance in the remaining precincts — many of which were in heavily blue areas like Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia.” While some precincts in each of those states did continue counting ballots, reports from late election night to early on Nov. 4 said election officials in these states had stopped their counts, perhaps in violation of state election laws. (Related: CONFIRMED: Trump pardoned Flynn to put him back in play at the DoD with Chris Miller and Ezra Cohen-Watnick in preparation for mass ARRESTS of treasonous deep state actors.) “By the early hours of the following morning, Wisconsin had flipped blue, as did Michigan soon after. A few days later, Georgia and Pennsylvania followed suit. Given the uncertain context, many American observers and commentators were immediately uncomfortable or skeptical of these trends,” the analysis noted. And soon after is when the four statistical anomalies that varied so differently from typical vote update patterns based on NY Times updates occurred, the most stark in Wisconsin: There, Biden was behind in the early hours of Nov. 4 but got a “spike” of votes of more than 100,000 to take the lead. “Through several investigative mechanisms, we find these four vote updates to be extraordinarily anomalous. While these alone do not prove the existence of fraud or systemic issue, it invites further scrutiny,” says the analysis. “The basic intuition is: big margins are one thing, and so are super-skewed results, but it’s weird to have them both at the same time, as they generally become inversely related as either value increases.” The analysis concludes that, based on the statistical anomalies in those four odd updates, combined with the way that votes broke in such a big way for Biden, require further study because something simply isn’t right. "It is our belief that the extraordinarily anomalous nature of the studied vote updates here, combined with the staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation,” the authors conclude. Stay current with up-to-the-minute vote fraud reporting on the 2020 election at VoteFraud.news. Sources include: VotePatternAnalysis.com NaturalNews.com

treason theft rigged voter fraud investigation Joe Biden election fraud vote fraud President Trump 2020 election statistics election theft election analysis anomalies extraordinary